Emegenc ighting Safe thanks to ONLITE

Every country has its own emer-gency regulations but if we take the UK as an example antages – Increased safety by splitting emergency supply into several autonomous systems in indivi-dual fire compartments or floors– Minimised fire load by redu- cing the amount of cable used – Fewer wall openings necessi-tating fire barriers, resulting in drastic savings – No extra or specialist rooms re-quired to accommodate batteries– Easy to extend by adding extra systems Chas soe er real beneits to oer Whilst there has been a tempta- tion in the past to consider emergency lighting as a fit andforget solution, recent legislationhas passed responsibility firmly back into the hands of the buil- ding owner/occupier. Not onlyhas he the responsibility toensure that the emergency lighting is suitable and sufficientbut, via mandatory risk assess-ments, that the emergency light- ing is subject to ongoing and thorough testing, logging andmaintenance.Self Contained EmergencyManual keyswitch test systemshave been replaced by automa-ted systems as the only viable option. Self-contained Z-Testemergency packs provide on-going, fully automatic self-moni- toring and testing and are fittedfully integral to TECTON gear-trays.Further convenience is providedby the ZAD-Test system integra- ted into TECTON, which provi- des fully programmable, central-ly controlled ongoing emergency lighting testing and recordingwithout the complexity and costof loose bus installations. Central Battery EmergencyONLITE Section Central is a tru- ly viable alternative to self-con-tained consisting of compact,local central battery systems each able to operate a floor orpart of a building as a separatesafety area. Individual luminaires are addressed, controlled andmonitored from a control panelin each local battery system. t erhas the greatest a-antage Huge reduction in on-going testing and maintenance effort and cost.

ONTE